Trump’s Opposition to EV Policies Creates New Challenges for Charging Infrastructure

Electric vehicle (EV) sales in the U.S. have been steadily growing, but the push to fully transition from gas-powered vehicles has encountered significant hurdles. Among the most pressing challenges is the lack of charging infrastructure, particularly in rural and underserved communities. As EV sales rise, the need for a reliable and extensive network of charging stations is crucial. However, recent political developments, specifically under the Trump administration, are adding a new layer of uncertainty to the EV charging sector, creating what many are now calling a new form of “range anxiety” – not for the vehicles, but for the infrastructure that supports them.

The Biden administration had made substantial strides in addressing this issue through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program, part of the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. With an ambitious $5 billion earmarked for building 500,000 high-speed EV chargers by 2030, NEVI’s goal was to reduce charging gaps, particularly in rural and remote areas, and promote a nationwide shift towards cleaner transportation. The initiative was designed to ease range anxiety, a major barrier to EV adoption, by ensuring that drivers could find chargers across the country.

However, on February 6, 2025, the Trump administration ordered a freeze on NEVI funding, causing immediate confusion and concern among state transportation departments (DOTs) and charging infrastructure providers. The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued a memo that suspended new funding for EV charger deployment under the NEVI program, with the intention of reviewing and revising the guidelines for the program. While existing contracts would still be funded, the future of approved projects was left in question.

This move has significant implications for the charging infrastructure sector, as it disrupts the momentum built by the NEVI program and delays planned installations. For many EV charging companies, including major players like ChargePoint Holdings, Blink Charging, and EVgo, the uncertainty surrounding NEVI funding has put additional strain on their operations. Shares of these companies have taken a hit, with stock prices plummeting by 35% to 50% in the past year, reflecting the growing concern over the potential slowdown in infrastructure development.

The freeze has also raised legal questions about the Trump administration’s authority to unilaterally halt congressionally approved funding. The NEVI program was authorized under the bipartisan infrastructure law, and altering or rescinding such funding would typically require legislative action. Despite this, the Trump administration has taken matters into its own hands, triggering potential legal battles that could further delay charging station development. As of March 6, a federal judge blocked the hold on some NEVI funds, adding a layer of legal uncertainty to the situation.

In addition to the freeze on NEVI funding, there are concerns about the broader message that the Trump administration is sending regarding electric vehicles and climate policy. Critics argue that the decision to freeze funding and delay infrastructure projects is part of a larger effort to undermine EV adoption and promote oil and gas interests. By positioning itself against EV growth and halting the necessary support for infrastructure, the administration’s actions could lead to a significant setback in the transition to cleaner energy and transportation.

At a time when millions of Americans are increasingly considering EVs as a viable alternative to traditional vehicles, the lack of widespread, accessible charging stations remains a critical issue. While automakers like Ford, Tesla, and others continue to invest in EV production, the infrastructure required to support the growing number of electric vehicles on the road is still lagging behind.

The impact of these recent policy changes could exacerbate the situation, particularly in rural areas where charging stations are already sparse. The delay in NEVI funding is not just a political issue; it has real-world consequences for consumers who are hesitant to fully commit to electric vehicles due to the lack of charging options. The move by the Trump administration could lead to further fragmentation of the EV market, slowing adoption and making it more difficult for consumers to make the switch to electric.

Ultimately, the future of EV infrastructure depends on the resolution of this political and legal battle. If the NEVI program is reinstated with revised guidelines, it could help restore confidence in the EV charging sector and encourage further investment. However, if the freeze continues or funding is cut, it could slow the growth of EV adoption and hinder the U.S. from meeting its climate goals. The uncertainty created by these political moves is a new form of range anxiety, one that threatens to delay the much-needed shift toward sustainable transportation.

About Us

Charged UP! is one of the most widely read publications in the EV charging space. Our approach is to take topics that are of interest to everyone and mention companies that provide best in class approaches. To discuss including your products or services, contact us at info@chargeduppro.com

At Charged Up!, we are committed to keeping businesses and individuals informed about the evolving EV landscape. For more updates and insights, subscribe to our newsletter at chargeduppro.com/subscribe.