Even If War Ends, Its Cost for Property Owners Has Just Begun

Grid Stress, Storms and Resilience Economics| Policy and Market Rules| 2026 Middle East series

May 06, 2026•15 min read

By Keith Reynolds | Publisher & Editor, ChargedUp!

Wednesday morning, May 6: Oil prices plunged at the open after Axios reported that the United States and Iran are working on a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war. Brent crude fell as much as 11 percent intraday to $96 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate dropped 15 percent to $88. Both benchmarks moderated by midmorning, with Brent trading near $103 and WTI near $95, after President Trump told the New York Post it was "too soon" to prepare for a deal signing. Iran's navy posted on X that, with new protocols in place, safe and stable passage through the Strait of Hormuz "will be ensured." Stock futures surged. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield dropped to a one-week low.

Hours earlier, the average U.S. price of regular gasoline crossed $4.50 per gallon for the first time since July 2022, an increase of more than 50 percent since the war began on Feb. 28. The deal news did not slow the climb at the pump. Refined product takes weeks to reach retail. The supply hole that the war dug is still wide open.

S&P Global Commodity Insights reported this week that global crude oil inventories fell by approximately 200 million barrels in April, the largest monthly drawdown ever recorded. The cumulative supply loss since the war began approaches 1 billion barrels. Even with a deal signed today, the International Energy Agency estimates two years before Middle East flow returns to normal. The Section 179D and Section 30C tax-incentive deadlines for property owners are 55 days away.

This morning's news could be the moment the Iran-United States war begins to end. The market reaction was swift and large. Brent crude fell roughly $10 per barrel within an hour of the Axios report. The S&P 500 futures jumped. The 10-year Treasury yield, which sets the floor for commercial real estate borrowing costs, hit its lowest level in about a week. Mortgage News Daily data suggests the average 30-year mortgage rate, which had reached 6.54 percent on Monday, is likely to fall in the coming days if the morning's market moves hold. (NBC News).

It would be easy to interpret the morning's news as the all-clear signal for property owners and planners who have spent the past nine weeks watching utility rate filings, transformer lead times and energy operating costs move in difficult directions. That interpretation does not survive the underlying numbers. The war ending in May does not erase the supply gap the war has already created. The energy cost pressure on commercial real estate operating budgets and city operating budgets is set to continue regardless of what happens in Pakistan this week.

Jim Burkhard, head of crude oil research at S&P Global Commodity Insights, told the Financial Times this week that global oil inventories fell by approximately 200 million barrels in April, the largest monthly drawdown ever recorded. In normal months, global inventories rise or fall by hundreds of thousands of barrels. The April decline was 200 times that scale. Burkhard called the drop extraordinary and said a market shock is moving closer. Total oil supply that has disappeared from the global market since Feb. 28 now approaches 1 billion barrels. (Korea Economic Daily on the FT report, Oil & Gas Journal).

This is what makes the current moment different from previous oil-price spikes. In a normal supply shock, high prices destroy demand, lower demand allows inventories to rebuild, and prices come back down on their own. This time, demand is being destroyed at the sharpest rate seen outside the COVID-19 pandemic, but inventories are still falling, and falling at the fastest pace ever recorded. Burkhard described the situation as a double depletion: both supply and demand are contracting, but supply is contracting faster.

Mohamed El-Erian, the prominent economist and chief economic adviser at Allianz, drew attention to the Financial Times report on social media Tuesday afternoon, calling the inventory drawdown an important issue to watch in the coming weeks. He singled out the data because the data matters. Energy costs are about to move into commercial operating expenses in ways that have not yet shown up in utility bills.

This is Part 10 of an ongoing series. The full strategic argument for distributed energy investment as the optimal response to the crisis is developed in the ChargedUp! white paper The Energy-Equity Connection, which I presented at last week's American Planning Association National Planning Conference in Detroit with John Gaffigan of SuMapp and Max DiCapri of Yuasa.

Why a Deal Today Does Not End the Cost Impact

Two years. That is the timeline the International Energy Agency has identified for Middle East oil flows to return to normal even after a complete cease-fire. Mine clearance in the Strait of Hormuz, repair to damaged infrastructure at Fujairah and other regional hubs, and the gradual restart of curtailed Iranian production each take time. Iran's navy posted on X this morning that safe passage will be ensured "with new protocols in place," but did not specify what those protocols are or how long they would take to implement. (Arabian Gulf Business Insight, citing IEA data).

Rory Johnston, founder of the energy data firm Commodity Context, told CNBC last month that any reopening of the strait would likely trigger an immediate drop of $10 to $20 per barrel in crude prices because of speculative positioning. The morning's $10 move is consistent with that view. Johnston added that the immediate relief would be temporary. Supply chain bottlenecks, infrastructure damage and lingering production outages would keep the market tight. Johnston's estimate: Brent anchors at $80 to $90 per barrel rather than returning to the $70 range that prevailed in February before the war. (CNBC timeline of Iran war oil prices).

The U.S. Energy Information Administration's April Short-Term Energy Outlook arrives at a similar conclusion through different math. The agency estimated that disrupted oil production in the Middle East averaged 7.5 million barrels per day in March and reached 9.1 million barrels per day at peak in April. The EIA's forecast for 2027, after flows resume, is a Brent price averaging $76 per barrel. That is more than $20 above the agency's February forecast and roughly $5 above pre-conflict levels. The government view, in plain terms, is that Hormuz does not return to normal economically, even after the diplomatic crisis ends.

The supply data confirms the same picture. Tuesday saw one commercial ship transit the Strait of Hormuz, according to ship tracking services. Monday saw four. Pre-war daily traffic was hundreds of vessels carrying more than 20 percent of global oil supply. The shipping rebuild has not yet begun. The International Maritime Organization continues to report 20,000 seafarers stranded on approximately 2,000 vessels in or near the strait. The Fujairah Oil Industry Zone, the bunkering hub on the U.A.E. coast, reported that oil-product inventories fell to 6.98 million barrels for the week ended April 27, the fourth consecutive record low and a 66 percent drop since Feb. 28. Heavy distillate stocks, used to power container ships and to generate electricity at industrial sites, fell 14 percent in a single week. Fujairah was attacked again on Monday, the sixth strike on the hub since the war began.

Andy Lipow, president of the Houston-based industry consultancy Lipow Oil Associates, told CNN this week that U.S. gasoline prices could reach $5 per gallon next month if the strait remains restricted, approaching the June 2022 record of $5.02. Lipow estimates oil prices would fall about $10 per barrel if the conflict ended immediately, which is roughly the move that occurred this morning. He made that estimate when Brent was at $117 and inventories were 200 million barrels higher than they are now. The math has gotten harder to escape. (CNN).

How Energy Costs Reach Buildings and Communities

Most commercial property owners and city planners experience global oil prices indirectly, through three transmission channels. Each one is now under pressure regardless of how the diplomatic story resolves.

The first channel is electricity rates. Roughly 40 percent of U.S. electric power generation comes from natural gas, and U.S. natural gas prices have become more closely tied to global oil prices through liquefied natural gas exports. When global LNG buyers in Asia and Europe pay more, U.S. exporters can charge more, which raises the price of natural gas at home. State public utility commissions are processing rate-increase requests from approximately 242 electric utilities, according to the Center for American Progress. Those filings reflect pre-war assumptions. The April inventory data will appear in the next round of cases.

The second channel is fuel-cost adjustment clauses, the mechanisms utilities use to recover changes in fuel input costs through monthly bill riders. Those riders move quickly and have already begun to appear on commercial bills in PJM, the regional grid that covers 13 states from Illinois to North Carolina. The PJM capacity auction that cleared in December 2025 set the price utilities pay to generators at the federally approved cap of $333.44 per megawatt-day, a tenfold increase over the prior cycle. PJM's own analysis projected that change alone would add roughly $70 per month to the average residential bill by 2028. Commercial bills, which are larger, will see proportionally larger increases. PECO has filed for a $429 million rate hike. PPL settled at $275 million, including a 10-year tariff template for new data center customers. Xcel Energy is seeking $356 million in Colorado and $574 million in Minnesota over two years.

The third channel is direct fuel cost in property operations. Diesel-powered landscaping, snow removal, security patrols, vendor service trucks, freight on tenant fit-outs and contractor mileage all reprice when gasoline and diesel rise. The American Automobile Association's national average for regular gasoline crossed $4.50 per gallon Wednesday morning, an increase of more than $1.50 from the pre-war average of $2.98. The increase compounds across operating budget lines that are typically not visible until the year-end roll-up.

For multifamily property owners, the pressure runs through tenants as well as through the building. Higher gasoline prices reduce discretionary household spending, which reduces tenant ability to absorb rent increases. For municipal planners, the same pressure runs through small business retention, transit ridership economics and the pace at which property tax base grows. Energy costs are not abstract macroeconomic data. They become NOI compression for owners and revenue compression for cities, working through the same operating budgets.

The Decisions That Get Made in the Next 55 Days

The federal tax incentives that have funded most of the distributed-energy work in commercial real estate over the past three years come from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025. Two of those incentives expire on June 30, 2026, which is 55 days from this morning. The morning's deal news does not change that calendar.

Section 179D allows commercial property owners to deduct up to $5.94 per square foot for energy-efficient lighting, HVAC and building-envelope improvements that meet specific energy-savings thresholds and labor standards. On a 100,000-square-foot building, the maximum deduction is $594,000. Section 30C provides a 30 percent tax credit for installing electric vehicle charging infrastructure, capped at $100,000 per location. Both expire for projects that have not begun construction by June 30. After that date, the same project carries a permanently higher net cost of roughly 15 to 25 percent.

Two related incentives continue beyond the deadline but with tightening conditions. Section 48E, the Investment Tax Credit, provides 30 percent of installed cost for behind-the-meter solar and battery storage. Domestic content rules under that credit will tighten through 2027, raising the cost of equipment that does not meet U.S. manufacturing requirements. The 100 percent first-year bonus depreciation restored under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act applies to qualified energy equipment acquired after Jan. 19, 2025. Combined with Section 179D and Section 30C, the federal incentive stack on a project that begins construction before June 30 can offset 40 to 50 percent of total cost.

The transformer constraint complicates the calendar. Wood Mackenzie tracks lead times for the large electrical transformers required for almost all utility-scale and many commercial-scale energy projects. Lead times for power transformers now average 128 weeks, or roughly two and a half years. Generator step-up units, which connect on-site generation to the grid, average 144 weeks. Three-phase pad-mount distribution transformers, used at the building level, are projected to remain in shortage through 2027 as data centers, manufacturing reshoring and electric vehicle charging infrastructure compete for the same manufacturing slots. Power transformer prices are up 77 percent from 2019 levels.

The combination of the transformer lead time and the federal deadline means that for most projects, the procurement decision must close in May, not June. Manufacturers prioritize customers with executed purchase orders, not letters of intent. Owners working the math in early May are at the edge of the runway. Owners waiting to see whether the diplomatic deal closes before deciding will not clear the tax-incentive deadline.

What the Industrial Real Estate Comparable Looks Like

Prologis, the world's largest industrial real estate investment trust and the owner of approximately 1.3 billion square feet of warehouse and logistics property, disclosed in its first-quarter 2026 earnings on April 16 that it has completed approximately 1.3 gigawatts of installed solar and battery storage on its rooftops, with a stabilized return of 11.4 percent. The company's data-center power pipeline now reaches 5.6 gigawatts, with 1.3 gigawatts under letter of intent. Susan Uthayakumar, Prologis's chief energy and sustainability officer, told the trade publication Trellis in March that the company's executive committee approves capital for solar and clean energy projects when projected returns reach 11 to 13 percent. The chief financial officer, she said, likes the returns and the income. (Prologis Q1 2026 SEC filing, Trellis).

Prologis is presenting at Microgrid Knowledge 2026 in Orlando this week, alongside Duke Energy, Schneider Electric and Bloom Energy. The company is no longer pitching solar to its tenants. It is presenting alongside utilities and equipment manufacturers as a peer in the distributed-energy sector. The company's deployed capacity is roughly equivalent to the output of a regional utility.

For owners of industrial real estate at any scale, the Prologis disclosures function as a comparable. Three numbers stand out. The 11 percent to 13 percent stabilized yield target is now a published benchmark. The 18-to-22 month construction-to-stabilization timeline is the operating standard. And the role of distributed energy, in Prologis's case, has shifted from environmental positioning to a core revenue and asset-management function. Other industrial owners reading the SEC filings can underwrite against those numbers rather than against speculative ranges. The same federal incentive deadline applies to them.

What Owners and Planners Should Do This Week

Three actions worth taking in the next 30 days, in order of urgency.

First, lock transformer commitments before May 20 for any project that intends to begin construction by June 30. Manufacturers are confirming orders against firm purchase commitments. Letters of intent will not hold a place in the queue.

Second, run the Section 179D and Section 30C qualification analysis on every property in the portfolio that could support a retrofit. The deduction is large enough on a per-building basis to underwrite generation and EV charging deployment that pays back through energy savings, capacity-market revenue and demand-response payments. The federal stack closes the same day for every property. The decision to act on a single building is also a decision about every other building still in scope.

Third, stress-test the operating pro forma against a Brent price strip that holds at $80 to $100 per barrel through the end of 2026 and into early 2027. Even with the morning's deal news, that is the price range Rory Johnston and the EIA forecast describe. The owners using that price range as their planning case rather than their downside case are the ones building operating defenses that will carry their portfolios through the next two years of utility-rate filings.

The Diplomatic Story May End Soon. The Structural Story Will Continue.

The morning's news is the first credible report in nine weeks that the war between the United States and Iran may end soon. The market response was swift. The relief at the gas pump will lag the relief in oil futures by weeks. The relief on commercial utility rates will lag both by quarters. The relief on commercial real estate operating costs will arrive only after rate cases already on file at state commissions are litigated, settled or rejected. Most of those cases will not be revisited.

The April inventory data describes a market that has been cushioned by inventories that are now visibly depleting. The IEA's two-year recovery timeline describes a return to normal that does not arrive in time to relieve the pressure on Q3 and Q4 commercial utility rates. The federal tax-incentive window closes on its own schedule, regardless of how the Strait of Hormuz reopens. The 55 days between today and June 30 are when the decisions that protect commercial real estate value get made. The diplomatic story may end this week. The structural story has just begun.

ChargedUp! will continue tracking the Iran-United States crisis through resolution, with each installment focused on what the data tells owners, planners and the communities working with them about how to position for the period after.

Read our full series covering the Middle East conflict.

Sources and Further Reading

Keith Reynolds

Back to Blog